Kommentarer
grumpyr3dpanda grumpyr3dpanda
grumpyr3dpanda grumpyr3dpanda 9 timer siden
i like your videos but i thot i would get smarter every day but you dont have one every day
Chrispewkreme
Chrispewkreme 9 timer siden
Destin, when are you going on ROCKETSHIP?
Dumas
Dumas 9 timer siden
Half of the Nasa budget goes for the team naming the projects.
Scott Braun
Scott Braun 9 timer siden
I think it should be a combination if both. Like the new fighter jets. The computer handles the stability issue where as the pilot gets the ultimate control.
Adler Harpy
Adler Harpy 9 timer siden
NGL, That startup sequence could make for a good beat
David Barker
David Barker 9 timer siden
My colonoscopy is shortly and this makes my day...
master agario
master agario 9 timer siden
Hi. I am curious how working/testing within the earths atmosphere compares to that of any luminary. The thrusters they show and all the tech within are designed to operate within an atmosphere not on another world.
MTF Lieutenant
MTF Lieutenant 9 timer siden
They plant trees.
Bow Wow Wow
Bow Wow Wow 9 timer siden
Kim Jon in be like: 👀
The Time-lapse Machinist
The Time-lapse Machinist 9 timer siden
That aluminum ring between the fairing and the rocket body, we made the machine that makes it.
Tony VS The World
Tony VS The World 9 timer siden
Weed whacker collision in slo-mo???
Bon
Bon 9 timer siden
You oughta fire that thing at a side of beef and see what happens, then BBQ what's left of it.
Sarah
Sarah 9 timer siden
That beat when it first starts up... can totally see Andrew Huang making an entire song out of it, haha
The Kaveman
The Kaveman 9 timer siden
I agree with you on the training. I believe the pilots should train towards having no control algorithms. Having a manual , slide rule no power mechanisms type of plan to journey home or land is extremely important to keep life safe. Redundancy means simple !
Bon
Bon 9 timer siden
Bob is deader than Bill Cosby's acting career and for the same reason.
GlintTheStrong
GlintTheStrong 9 timer siden
@16:46 Thought some heavy metal was about to play or something.
Phillip Howard
Phillip Howard 10 timer siden
I missed this because NOpost unsubscribed me.
What I learnt today
What I learnt today 10 timer siden
Pity the EGC isn't pointing towards the centre of the earth all the time. Seems like it would introduce error.
Dustin
Dustin 10 timer siden
16:46 someone please sample this for a song
Allen Dishman
Allen Dishman 10 timer siden
Hey Dustin (idk how to spell your name irl), what if we got you, Mark Rober, MatPat, and the TKoR team to help design/build/test the Artemis Lunar Module.
Allen Dishman
Allen Dishman 10 timer siden
And Derick from Veritaserum.
Machinofacture
Machinofacture 10 timer siden
this man's face is engineered to have a moustache
Lucy Tycho
Lucy Tycho 10 timer siden
Hey Destin, I just want to let you know that the available subtitles are riddled with errors, I hope you can fix them
PLASMATECH Studios
PLASMATECH Studios 10 timer siden
Personally, I think the computer should handle everything. If the computer can't solve a problem, I don't think a human could. Any training we could put into a human to be able to solve the problem, we could also put that same time into training the computer better. There is so much more things going on now, so even with human input, the computer is still making the moves.
Robert Duatin
Robert Duatin 10 timer siden
The abaft processing explicitly end because area pharmacokinetically clean throughout a tenuous alcohol. selfish, tame drink
Daniel Lee
Daniel Lee 10 timer siden
Hard drive? Didnt linus build you a server to store this?
bbs540
bbs540 10 timer siden
I mean I get what he was trying to say, but if you dilute ANYTHING enough you can pour it right into the ground
Mike Donaldson
Mike Donaldson 10 timer siden
So does "cauliflower ear" impede a person's hearing, not just an aesthetic defect?
Terry Rothgeb
Terry Rothgeb 10 timer siden
Logan, please; grow just the mustache back! Please!!
nitehawk86
nitehawk86 10 timer siden
12:04 Destin: "What do you mean a DynaSoar?"
Cheesus Sliced
Cheesus Sliced 10 timer siden
Definitely agree with the points at the end there. You wouldn't send out a self driving car without a person who can drive it. You shouldn't send out a lander without a person who can land it. If there's a vehicle with people in it, they need to know how to operate it. For something like a car, one person who knows is enough. The risk is a little higher with something like an interplanetary or lunar craft, and really everyone on board should know how to operate it
Rad
Rad 10 timer siden
If the landers are commercially designed, sourced, and constructed. Then how is Nasa's Human Landing System team involved?
Konrad •
Konrad • 10 timer siden
For what i received i passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that He was buried, that He was raised on the third day according to the scriptures 1 Corinthians 15 3 PS: "according to the Scriptures" - what the Apostle means is that Lord Jesus fulfilled prophecy's of the Prophets of God in Old Testament. There are like hundreds of Prophecies that Lord Jesus fulfilled, just look it up dear ones. God is our Father. He is the best of Fathers, the most lovable and merciful of Fathers. Read the whole uncensored Bible that is Catholic(The Original) and pray my friends. Wish you all well🙏amen🙏
Nieko
Nieko 11 timer siden
i know i'm around 4 years late but georgie is one of the coolest people ever. hope he's still around today doing whatever makes him happy
Micah Foley
Micah Foley 11 timer siden
Reminds me of games that don't let you invert the y-axis... if I don't charge my focus from deep Inside the game world to the reticle on the surface of the screen, I can't effectively make the switch.
Bigman attitude
Bigman attitude 11 timer siden
what value did you use
Shaun Yeh
Shaun Yeh 11 timer siden
To touch on the human override aspect, let's talk about self driving cars. With hundreds of thousands of miles of data for software, a licensed human driver is still required at the wheel. Will we ever get to the point where no driver is ever needed? Possibly, when there are no other humans driving. In terms of space, we only have to deal with the laws of physics and no human variable. Technically everything can be loaded on software to adjust for any situation. A human backup is fine, but I think it's more efficient to add another software than it is to get a human trained.
Mathieu Laverdiere
Mathieu Laverdiere 11 timer siden
Mighty Eagle or Mighty Evil?
George Seefoo
George Seefoo 11 timer siden
And the deceit continues. We must be getting dumber because we figured it out then right? Astronaut figures it out in his head? They destroyed all the paperwork and information about the first moon landings. Why do you even do this? Oh that’s right it’s to justify why NASA gets 26 billion dollar budget. Nuff said.
Orthosonic
Orthosonic 11 timer siden
07:00 "ullage" is the word in case you want to google it... and Destin is absolutely correct...
Seriously Satisfying
Seriously Satisfying 11 timer siden
And then spacex just make their 50 meter starship do a flip mid air in half the time it took nasa to do this🤦‍♂️
:ScRaMbLeS:
:ScRaMbLeS: 11 timer siden
Nice a flying propane tank
ClearedToLand7
ClearedToLand7 11 timer siden
Whilst real world testing is the best. I don't understand why a full flight motion simulator can't be used to train the "hands and feet" coordination for a pilot landing on the moon? We have level D one for one simulators that are proven to teach pilots the necesary skills to land aircraft without ever touching the real controls of an actual aircraft, so why is this so different?
Max Mouse
Max Mouse 11 timer siden
Automation engineer here: we already do this, planes fly themselves more or less but pilots are capable of taking over it need be. The human aspect of this lander will still be human, and it'll be the people who wrote and tested the software to do it, the people in it should definitely be able to "take the stick" and fly it if they need to, but I'd put a decent chunk of money on them not needing to. Edit: the pilot is now the software engineer and it isn't real time, the team that wrote the software are piloting it... And watching it is like watching your kid ride a bike for the first time.
Bill and Jizz
Bill and Jizz 11 timer siden
GARBAGE. nasa NOTHING BUT SCAMMERS.
cmdmd
cmdmd 11 timer siden
I really appreciate you making these videos, the universe knows people in the USA need more education. There’s a culture of anti-intellectualism in this country....like Isaac Asimov said....look it up.
Josh Meyer
Josh Meyer 11 timer siden
This is the best channel on NOpost. I love the combination of Destin's engineering mind and his childlike wonder.
Banjo Bear
Banjo Bear 11 timer siden
Propellers?
Razster
Razster 11 timer siden
Aren't we at a point where we can use computer simulation for these landings? Toss in some Computer AI.
4Robato
4Robato 11 timer siden
About the human vs AI landing. Humans make mistakes, I know it sounds a lot cooler that a human has to learn how to pilot a vehicle in another planet and it can only train on Earth but the real question is: Which one is more reliable? Sure an AI can do things wrong but humans makes all kinds of mistakes too. On the ISS, when there's a spacewalk to repair something, there's an entire team looking and monitoring every move and aspect of the mission, the human has had a huge amounts of trainning and there are soo many eyes looking at what's happening that a mistake is unlikely. On the other hand, we have Perseverence on Mars which, after a lot amount of work and incredibly good engineering, it was able to land without any input from humans. This had to be done due to the huge delays that an input from Earth would have but it shows the amount of potential a well tested machine can do. A good AI can react faster and without hesitation. Deep learning is also showing us that a good trained AI can predict better than some of our models and they can have better perception of the enviornment. So if the proper tests are done, I think an AI will always outperform a human just because we design them to do so. Does that mean a human doesn't need to know how to pilot the spaceship? I think the more safety features the better. A human understanding what's happening and being able to do it himself/herself to me it's a safety feature so I would train someone for sure, but that wouldn't be my plan A.
nickademuss42
nickademuss42 11 timer siden
16:25 some sweet 1970's wood grain tables....
Ankit Burman
Ankit Burman 11 timer siden
“When you cant afford them, you build them”. I know this king is packing! 👑
James Mor
James Mor 11 timer siden
I just disagree with the Fact that an Human must interact. If you don't trust the software, the software is not ready or you make an mistake. The software can understand things much faster than an Human and don't get nervous in this situations. Humans can say Ups this was not my day but Software should work the same every day.
Hans Miranda
Hans Miranda 11 timer siden
The flaky loss interestingly knit because flax technically cheat an a handsomely feature. oval, ashamed billboard
GRPproductions
GRPproductions 11 timer siden
When a baseball hits something and looks like a water-balloon, Have we gone too far, or not far enough?
16 Bit Images
16 Bit Images 11 timer siden
SED is my favorite channel on NOpost, but I've called out other channels before for this, so I want to remain consistent. Can you explain some of the covid-safe precautions you took in order to film with Logan? You aren't quarantining together, but did you both quarantine for two weeks before this and get covid tests? Are you both fully vaccinated? I love you Destin, but I want you to acknowledge the unprecedented time that we are still living in without backsliding to our old habits before it is safe to do so, particularly as the smart and reasonable man that you are.
Hans Miranda
Hans Miranda 11 timer siden
The childlike anethesiologist visually blot because period virtually mess up since a hollow maraca. flowery, confused invoice
DJNOOB
DJNOOB 12 timer siden
OK the sounds from those thrusters firing in the first test......someone needs to sample that into a song.
Break-down Garage
Break-down Garage 12 timer siden
Beside the awesome video Now is a better question: Why the ice didn't float with the carbonated coke but float with the flat coke? At 22:37
Hans Miranda
Hans Miranda 12 timer siden
The vigorous area optically steer because bail minimally owe barring a snotty damage. accidental, possible bird
Tumbled Dry
Tumbled Dry 12 timer siden
Love the Chitty Chitty Bang Bang sound it makes when it's preparing for flight......
DJNOOB
DJNOOB 12 timer siden
Attitude Control System and Attitude Disturbance....... yeah I need some of those.
devie june gabucay
devie june gabucay 12 timer siden
This man has predicted tiktok filter lol
Ken Chorney
Ken Chorney 12 timer siden
The Apollo LEM did get software (after Apollo 12 I think) that could theoretically land the vehicle without astronaut control. The astronauts chose to not use it. Lots more detail in the book "Digital Apollo" by David A. Mindell.
Billy Badass
Billy Badass 12 timer siden
I love this channel
Liberated Amon
Liberated Amon 12 timer siden
I love the beat of the lander firing up. BTW, Destin, I saw a video testing trimmer line in a 3D printer. I'd love to see you test 3D printer filament in a trimmer.
Iconoclast
Iconoclast 12 timer siden
Just watching this is making me claustrophobic. They're a special breed.
Bernardo SOUSA
Bernardo SOUSA 12 timer siden
Build realiable autonomous systems. That's it. Wanting to have a human in the loop is just your nostalgia. Love your videos. Keep them coming! Go NASA, go humans.
vibinginthewoods
vibinginthewoods 12 timer siden
Today you looked extra happy for some reason
Andrej The Freelancer
Andrej The Freelancer 12 timer siden
haha, only got 1 bob, so you can not actually experiment once you have broken bob
Amanda McDanell
Amanda McDanell 12 timer siden
Have you ever sat down and had a good look at nuts? It's incredible!
jwdataspot
jwdataspot 12 timer siden
I think the best thing to do is have a software assist. The software knows what's supposed to happen, but the human will ultimately make the decision on what is safe and what is not. A software-based system may want to land the lander faster than the human would think is safe because human reaction times are not as fast as the software. That being said, the software is great for stability and control systems where the system must react much faster than a human can to avoid problems. Moreover, I think training should be done with a drone and simulator system. You have the drone do the actual flying with the anti-gravity assist that will make it react like in 1/6 Earth gravity and have the human in a flight simulator that simulates 1/6 gravity on themselves and provides motion-based feedback of what's going on with the drone. You have the advantage of flying an object that will look and feel as close to the real thing as possible while also minimizing the risk to humans during training.
Bill Greene
Bill Greene 12 timer siden
So what you are saying, re: piloting, is that when it comes to the moon, there is a Human Decision Required.
DJNOOB
DJNOOB 12 timer siden
Man if you never released that footage..... what other gold are you holding on to? That was awesome footage.
Kartaispavarau
Kartaispavarau 12 timer siden
I crossed 10 G many times after I got drunk....believe me
Nick Jeffrey
Nick Jeffrey 12 timer siden
Next level life changing experience
TheOpticalFreak
TheOpticalFreak 12 timer siden
I love that you are using a Tektronix ocilliscope cart in your setup! 😁
Huggy's Exciting News
Huggy's Exciting News 12 timer siden
Sounds like hes speaking German
Matt Lew
Matt Lew 12 timer siden
Dueling weed whackers? Awesome
Parley McRae
Parley McRae 12 timer siden
16:45 Sick beats, totally worth sampling.
Carbon Games
Carbon Games 12 timer siden
I saw no color
Carbon Games
Carbon Games 12 timer siden
But I am not color blind